

Pig$kin Empire wrote:!05 Reconcussioners wrote:Hey, I still have pick 1.11. Are you trying to short my pick?
Checking the archive, looks like you traded it away in a Waddle trade last season.
Oops!
!05 Reconcussioners wrote:Hey, I still have pick 1.11. Are you trying to short my pick?
Hey, I still have pick 1.11. Are you trying to short my pick?
Looking for WRs, QBs, 2027 picks. 1.11, 2.01, 2.05 are all available
OK, I ran some possible trades through various valuation sites and found out that it was much more likely to lead to a fair trade than I thought.
To my surprise, the KTC site gave the best results, even with their "Value Adjustment" being so large. With the right combination of players involved, I think that both side to the trade would be happy.
Good luck!
Not putting him officially on the trade block but I am curious what I could get for Josh Allen. I would have to get an elite to semi elite, younger qb back or maybe even two qbs as well as players and picks. The price would be more than what fantasy calculators would say is fair. Not only is he the highest scoring qb consistently, he's probably the safest. It would take an overpay by a deep team that is willing to move 2026 and 2027 picks. If that's too much , I totally understand. Just gauging the market.
When it comes to trading, only takes one team to offer the right price. Doesn't matter what the group think is. That's why I throw things out there to see if I get a good response. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
I agree with that idea. I am just relating my experience with trading high value players 8000+
It's hard to get KTC value for them unless there are high value players on both sides.
For example, trading QB1 for QB2 looks like this:
The difference between the 2 QBs is only 600, but when I add a 2318 player, the Value Adjustment is 1789 so I am only getting 529 for my 2318 player. AND that is when the players are extremely close in value.
If instead I offer QB 5
The Value Adjustment goes to 3719 and I need a 6009 player to be even!
Anyway, good luck and someone may make the offer.
BTW, just to see a possibility, why don't you shoot me an offer of Allen to me that you might think would work by private message and I'll go over it with you.
!05 Reconcussioners wrote:You will run into the super high priced stud paradox.
Unless the stud is very young, it makes no sense for the buyer.
With the premium for a stud, it is almost impossible for the buyer to even make a fair trade, let alone a trade that pays more than the stud is worth. Try it. On KTC add a 4500 player to the mix and the Value Adjustment goes up by 3000. So its like the buyer getting 1500 for his 4500 player.
Then if the buyer hugely overpays, it is at such a great cost, that they are non-competitive for several years. By that time the stud has decreased in value and the buyer is still non-competitive.
Your best option is to hope that Allen drops a ton in value and you overpay to get rid of him. LOL
When it comes to trading, only takes one team to offer the right price. Doesn't matter what the group think is. That's why I throw things out there to see if I get a good response. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
You will run into the super high priced stud paradox.
Unless the stud is very young, it makes no sense for the buyer.
With the premium for a stud, it is almost impossible for the buyer to even make a fair trade, let alone a trade that pays more than the stud is worth. Try it. On KTC add a 4500 player to the mix and the Value Adjustment goes up by 3000. So its like the buyer getting 1500 for his 4500 player.
Then if the buyer hugely overpays, it is at such a great cost, that they are non-competitive for several years. By that time the stud has decreased in value and the buyer is still non-competitive.
Your best option is to hope that Allen drops a ton in value and you overpay to get rid of him. LOL
LOL, a compulsive trader is now making fantasy trades.
I guess that's why they call it fantasy football. ROFL